Fix sheet: Sending too many connection requests per day

This sheet appended when your report flagged the `volume` weakness.

The number that matters

LinkedIn's algorithmic ceiling on connection requests sits at roughly 20-25/day per account before penalty kicks in, and the penalty only fires when acceptance is under ~30% at that volume. Combine "high volume" with "low acceptance" and you enter a decay loop: requests get shown to fewer people, acceptance drops more, restrictions follow.

The 3 things to fix this week

  1. Throttle. Drop daily new-request volume to 15 for 7 days, regardless of how it affects your pipeline math. Acceptance will recover in week 2 because the algorithm rewards account-level health signals over time.
  1. Audit your touch 1. Re-read the connection note you are sending. If it has any of: a meeting ask, a calendly link, "I help companies like yours", or "saw your post" without naming what about the post — it is too sales-y and is dragging acceptance down. Use the touch 1 template in the playbook.
  1. Split the volume across accounts. Two accounts at 15/day each beats one account at 30/day on every dimension. If you only have one account today, see the single-account fix sheet for the trade-offs of running a pool.

What "fixed" looks like

Acceptance climbs from <15% back to the 25-35% healthy band within 2-3 weeks. The 20-25/day volume ceiling can then be safely held indefinitely — accounts in that band can run for 6-12 months without a restriction.

How BIGM solves it

We run aged-account pools and split the same total daily volume across 4-6 warmed accounts. Each one stays well under the 20/day ceiling, the pool aggregate matches what you would otherwise send from one account, and ban risk drops to near zero because no single account is bearing visible volume.

Score your account against the full rubric.
60 seconds. 8 questions. 0-100 score + ban-risk band.
Take the 60-sec check →